No difference between the approach to prove evolution for example, and the approach to prove the faithful presence of God; as both are based on reasoning effects, so why is described the curriculum behavior have scientific accuracy

  • No difference between the approach to prove evolution for example, and the approach to prove the faithful presence of God; as both are based on reasoning effects, so why is described the curriculum behavior have scientific accuracy

No difference between the approach to prove evolution for example, and the approach to prove the faithful presence of God; 
as both are based on reasoning effects, 
so why is described the curriculum behavior have scientific accuracy, but dont described curriculum believers the same 
, with that they both agree in the way of prooving ?!!

, [19.04.19 12:29]
No one had seen elecrtrons or protons or electricity , but people see their effects .
The same in presence of God .
You cant see him but we see his signs everywhere around us .

#atom

We studied the atomic properties, we still have not seen atoms till that  today directly, 

The atomic bomb supported our theories about atomic  functions, 

We only rely in our phenomenas on effects .

< PREVIOUS NEXT >