Articles

Terrosim in perspective





The problem with putting terrorism into perspective is that there is no agreed-upon definition of what constitutes “terrorism”. Also, terrorism takes many forms, as the following examples illustrate.


Robert Fisk, from The Independent, writes: “Israel and Israel’s militia allies (on 16 September 1982) started their three-day orgy of rape, knifing and murder in the Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila that cost 1,800 lives. It followed an Israeli invasion of Lebanon designed to drive the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organisation) out of the country and given the green light [by the United States] which cost the lives of 17,500 Lebanese and Palestinians, almost all of them civilians.”


According to Professor Noam Chomsky, “It’s uncontroversial that the United States is a leading terrorist state. In fact, it’s the only state that was condemned for international terrorism by the highest bodies: the International Court of Justice in 1986.”


Similarly, “The horrific massacre of 8,000 Muslims – some unarmed – at Srebrenica in 1995 never led to a stream of pieces about the violence and repressive tendencies of Christianity.” – William Dalrymple, The Independent UK.


“The carnage wrought by Western, ostensibly Christian, leaders over the last six decades – including a world war and a cold war, a Holocaust, two atomic bombs, repression of wars of independence, the fuelling of proxy wars, nuclear brinksmanship, and the support of dictators and state and non-state terrorists – makes it spurious to view Islam as a more inherently violent religion or civilisation.” – Rama Mani (Geneva Centre for Security Policy)


There are many other examples of both Jewish and Christian terrorism, however, we must never generalise and call all Christians and Jews terrorists. Similarly, we should not put all Muslims on trial but only those that committed the crime should be judged.


Islam Denounces Terrorism


The act of inciting terror in the hearts of defenceless civilians, the wholesale destruction of buildings and properties, the bombing and maiming of innocent men, women and children are all forbidden and detestable acts according to Islam and the Muslims. This is regardless of any type of terrorism, including western state-sponsored terrorism which has killed, injured and displaced infinitely more people than all other types of terrorism.


If an individual Muslim were to commit an act of terrorism, this person would be guilty of violating the laws of the very religion they claim to follow – Islam. Would it be fair to condemn all Muslims as a result, when the religion itself is against such acts? Muslims follow a religion of submission to God, peace, mercy, and forgiveness. The vast majority have nothing to do with the violent events some – notably the media – have associated with Muslims. Islam is not a religion of extremism.


“Allah does not forbid you from showing kindness and dealing justly with those who have not fought you about religion and have not driven you out of your homes. Allah loves those who are just.” Qur’an 60:8


 



 



Recent Posts

𝐁𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐛𝐧 𝐑𝐚𝐛𝐚𝐡 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐅 ...

𝐁𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐛𝐧 𝐑𝐚𝐛𝐚𝐡 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐅𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐌𝐮𝐞𝐳𝐳𝐢𝐧 (𝐏𝐫𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 𝐂𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐫) 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐈𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐦

𝐏𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐧 𝐑𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐓𝐫 ...

𝐏𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐧 𝐑𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐓𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐃𝐨𝐜𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐞