the ninth lie

butrus says: in makkah allah's messenger (pbuh) had raised the slogan of tolerance as he used to recite the verse: "would you then compel mankind until they are believers?” (younos : 99). he, may allah disfigure him for his lies & deceit, asserts such meaning in another location saying:  "at the beginning the call for allah found no opposition due to the freedom of belief and the commercial interests and due to his calling for "al-hanifiah" ( the call of abraham) which was prevailing at that time". he reiterates such notion so much trying to convince the audience that allah's messenger (pbuh) at first used the method of flattery & peacefulness and when his powers increased he started to apply violence by fighting and by the "jihad".

 in reply to this i said: first the verse which he concludes "would you then compel mankind until they are believers?” ( younos : 99). such verse is not makkian as he claims, it was revealed in madinah and this is enough to nullify his view. in addition to this he is undecided in the same matter and of course this is the way of all liars. for example in another location he says that allah's messenger (pbuh) used to call them unbelievers and used to mock their idols in makkah and that due to this "hell was raised in makkah" -as the announcer who talks to him puts it in agreement to butrus’ words. the total of his words refutes one another and such is the condition of all liars.

in order to elucidate his lying in such matter i would like to point out two things:

first: in regards to the opposition of the call

second: in regards to al-hanifia (the unswervingly right religion) and those who follow it.

first: zakaria butrus in so many occasions reiterates that the call originally was because quraish was seeking for reign over the arabs, or bani hashem’s seeking reign over quraish and the arabs. such talk is void of sense for whoever goes through the prophet's (pbuh) biography finds out that the call was faced with fierce opposition from quraish and bani hashem the clan of allah's messenger (pbuh).

narrated by al-bukhari, ibn abbas said: when the verse: “and warn your tribe of near-kindred”, was revealed, the prophet ascended the safa (mountain) and started calling, "o bani fihr! o bani 'adi!" addressing various tribes of quraish till they were assembled. those who could not come themselves, sent their messengers to see what was there. abu lahab and other people from quraish came and the prophet then said, "suppose i told you that there is an (enemy) cavalry in the valley intending to attack you, would you believe me?" they said, "yes, for we have not found you telling anything other than the truth." he then said, "i am a warner to you in face of a terrific punishment." abu lahab said (to the prophet) "may your hands perish all this day. is it for this purpose you have gathered us?" then it was revealed: "perish the hands of abu lahab (one of the prophet's uncles and the son of abdul mutalib ibn hashem), and perish he! his wealth and his children will not profit him...."

allah's messenger (pbuh) had gathered his kinship and called them to embrace islam but they mocked him and took his words in a funny way and left him behind their backs, and there many narrations to prove this. abu al-drada' reported that he heard allah's messenger (pbuh) saying: "the most ascetic of people are the prophets and those who oppose them most are their relatives".

as allah the almighty revealed in the holy quran :


and warn your tribe (o muhammad ) of near kindred. and be kind and humble to the believers who follow you. then if they disobey you, say: "i am innocent of what you do."


 ( as-shu’araa' 214-216).

 quraish was acting just like bani hashim warning the people of following allah's messenger (pbuh) and giving him their backs themselves. they used to torture whoever followed allah's messenger (pbuh), they even accused him of being a sorcerer and of being crazy. they besieged him and all his followers in one of makkah's passes for three years until they were on the verge of death from hunger & thirst. they used different ways in order to sway him from spreading islam; one time with money another with reign and authority. allah's messenger (pbuh) never did submit to their alluring, but used to call them disbelievers. " say, "o you disbelievers, i do not worship what you worship,  nor  are you worshiping what i worship, nor am i worshiping what you have worshiped, nor are you worshiping what i worship, to you is your religion, and to me is my religion!" (al-kafiroon 1-6)

the call was mainly supported by two tribes other than quraish namely; al-aous & al-khazraj and not in makkah but in madinah. quraish was the principal enemy in the war against allah's messenger (pbuh) in: badr, uhud, al-ahzab, al-hudaibiah, and the conquest of makkah. is it possible after mentioning all these facts to say that the call was hashemite or qurashian? or that it started off with flattery & peacefulness?

second: regarding al-hanifia (the unswervingly right religion) and those who follow it.

al-hanifia was not a well established call before allah's messenger (pbuh) was sent. those who followed it were not spread here and there, in fact it had one follower in makkah or to be more precise in the whole arab peninsula in addition to very few christians (counted less than five) and who had no effect whatsoever on the course of events there. quraish and the arabs in general were worshiping idols claiming that this was the hanifia, they would not permit anyone to mock these idols or to call for their abandonment, just like every regime in history. never did it happen before allah's messenger (pbuh) was sent that anyone, except for zaid ibn nofail, challenged them. as for zaid ibn nofail they assigned him to his uncle (al-khattab ibn nofail) who sent him out of makkah and he in turn assigned some young men to make sure he never gets in again, to ensure that he will not instigate people to leave their religion and join his. zaid lived his life lonely and died lonely and he never claimed to be a prophet.

the point here is that there was no religion called al-hanifia, to be more specific al-hanifia was not a wide spread religion among the arabs before allah's messenger (pbuh) was sent. quraish and the arabs were pagans and claimed that this was al-hanifia, everyone claimed to be a follower of abraham (pbuh). allah's messenger (pbuh) called for al-haifia (religion of abraham) which in other words is islam, the religion of allah and the reason of sending all the prophets with the message:

 "and whoever desirously shirks from the creed of ibrahîm (abraham) except he who befools himself? and indeed we have already elected him in the present (life), (literally: the lowly, i.e., the life of this world) and surely in the hereafter he is indeed among the righteous."

( al-bakara : 130)

allah the almighty says:

” and they have said, "be judaic or nasara, (christian) (then) you shall be guided." say, "no, indeed, (but) it is the creed of ibrahîm, (abraham) the unswervingly (upright, ) (i.e. veering away from idolatry) and in no way was he one of the associators. (i.e. those who associate others with' allah)".

 (al-bakara : 135).

 allah also says:

 " say,  allah has (spoken) sincerely, so closely follow the creed of ibrahîm, (abraham) the unswervingly (upright) (i.e., veering away from idolatry) and in no way was he one of the associators." (i.e., those who associate others with allah)".

( al imaran : 95)

 and allah says:

 " and who has a fairer religion than he who surrenders his face to allah, and is a fair-doer, and closely follows the creed of ibrahîm (abraham) the unswervingly upright? and allah took to him ibrahîm for a (close) fellow". 

(an nisaa : 125)

we believe that all the prophets were followers of islam, which is literally surrendering totally to allah the almighty who has no associates. this is al-tawhid (monotheism) which is indeed the religion of abraham. to us all the prophets are muslims, to us there is but one religion “islam” but there are many legislations. abraham (pbuh) was a muslim:

 " in no way was ibrahîm a jew, neither a christian; (i.e. a follower of isa "jesus", nasraniyyan) but he was an unswervingly (upright) (i.e. veering away from idolatry) muslim; and in no way was he one of the associators (those who associate others with allah)".

( al imran : 67)

 "as his lord said to him, "surrender, " (i.e., be muslim) he said, "i have surrendered to the lord of the worlds"

( al-bakara : 131)

 he and his son ismail used to ask allah, as mentioned in the quran:

" our lord, make us (both) muslims (i.e. surrendered) to you, and of our offspring a nation muslim to you, and show us our rituals and relent towards us; surely you ever you are the superbly relenting, the ever-merciful". 

(al-bakara :128)

yousof (joseph) (pbuh) was a muslim:

 "lord! you have already brought me (my share) of kingship and you have taught me (my share) of the interpretation of discourses. o originator (literally: renderer; i.e., creator) of the heavens and the earth, you are my ever-patronizing patron in the present (life) (literally: the lowly (life), the life of this world) and the hereafter, take me up to you as a muslim (one who submits to you) and join me with the righteous". 

(yousof : 101)

 also was moses (pbuh) and his people:

 "and mûsa said, "o my people, in case you have believed in allah, then in him put your trust, in case you are muslims." (i.e., you have surrendered to allah)".

(younos : 84 )

" and in no way do you take vengeance upon us except that we have believed in the signs of our lord as soon they came to us. our lord, pour out upon us patience and take us to yourself as muslims”.

(al-araf : 126)

noah (pbuh) was a muslim:

 "yet in case you turn away, then in no way have i asked you for any reward; decidedly my reward is not from anyone except allah, and i have been commanded to be one of the muslims." (those who surrender to allah)".

(younos : 72)

solomon (pbuh) in the story of his writing to the queen of saba':

 "that you should not exalt yourselves against me, and come up to me as muslims." (or: in surrender)".

(an-naml :31)

and "he said, "o you chiefs, whichever one of you will come up to me with (i.e., bring) her throne before they come up to me as muslims?" (or: in surrender)".

(an-naml : 38)

 "so, as soon as she came, it was said, "is your throne just like this?" she said, " (it is) as though it were the (very) one." and (sulayman) (solomon) said, "we were brought the knowledge before her, and we were muslims." (i.e., we surrendered "to allah")". (an-naml :42)

in description of the home of lot (pbuh) the angels said in the holy quran:

 "yet, in no way did we find therein other than one house of muslims; (i.e., those who surrender themselves to allah)". (az-zariat : 36 )

and so were the apostles of jesus (pbuh) as allah says:

 " and as i revealed to the disciples (the followers of isa "jesus", also called the apostles) (saying), "believe in me and in my messenger." they said, "we believe, and bear you witness that surely we (ourselves) are muslims." (literally: we have surrendered to him)".

( al-maeda : 111)

to sum up, all the prophets were sent with the message of al-tawhid (monotheism)

" and in no way did we send (any) messenger even before you except that we revealed to him, (saying), "there is no god except i; so worship me".

(al-anbia : 25).

the point is that the religion of abraham (pbuh) of which the quran and the purified sunnah speak is not that which was spoken of by quraish. spontaneously this means that the words of allah's messenger (pbuh) that he was a follower of abraham' religion was not meant to flatter them. it is evident for you now that allah's messenger (pbuh) used to contravene and antagonize quraish since day one and this is supported by the fact that most of the verses that spoke of "abraham religion" were revealed in madinah not in makkah.

The Lie that the Holy Quran Contains Mistakes

the tenth lie:

 zakaria butrus is buzzing a lot about the verse no.63 of surat taha:

which is in arabic pronounced as that:

 "qaloo in  hathani lasahiraniy ureedani an yukhrijakum min ardikum bisihrihima wa yathhaba bitareeqatikumu almuthla''

“they said, "decidedly these two (men) are indeed (both) sorcerers; they would (like) to drive you out of your land by their sorcery, and go away with your exemplary mode (of life).

butrus said that there is a linguistic mistake that might not done by a student of the third grade. he is telling lies and the reason is that the ayah is written in the quran and read with (in) diluted from the intensive and not (inna) the emphatic (stressed) and its known and famous  that (in) is different from (inna) the stressed .

he is telling lies as he utters the ayah in a different way than that in the quran then he said it is a linguistic mistake. and when one of the listeners answered him that it is written in the quran (in) the diluted  and not (inna) the stressed, this liar answered that al qurtuby said that there are some readings with stressing (inna) and not(in) and he stresses according to these readings. this is another lie, as al qurtuby said the one who reads with stress in this ayah must put '' hathani '' in the accusative form to be (inna hathain lasaherain)

and he didn't say that some of them stressed and then read what's after it in the nominative form as this mean liar alleged.

 (in) diluted from (inna) the emphatic (stressed) doesn't put the subject of the nominal sentence in the nominative form and doesn't put the predicate in the accusative form.


(in) comes with different meanings:

 -the conditional like in ayah no.6 from surat al tawaba:

that is pronounced as:

''wa-in ahadun mina almushrikeena istajaraka faajirhu hatta yasmaaaa kalama allahi thumma ablighhu ma’manahu thalika bi-annahum qawmun layaaalamoon”

“and if any one of the polytheists seeks your protection, then grant him protection so that he may hear the words of allah. then deliver him to his place of safety. that is because they are people who do not know”.

 -and the same meaning of (ma) negative:

''wayunthira allatheena qaloo ittakhatha allahu walada. ma lahum bihi min aailmin walali-aba-ihim kaburat kalimatan takhruju min afwahihim in yaqooloona illa kathiba''.

“and to warn the ones who have said, "allah has taken to him a child. in no way do they have any knowledge of it, (they) nor their fathers. an odious (literally: great) word it is, coming out (literally: going out) of their mouths; decidedly they say nothing except a lie.” ( al kahaf 4-5).

and allah's saying about jesus peace be upon him

''in huwa illa aaabdun anaaamnaaaalayhi wajaaaalnahu mathalan libanee isra-eel''

“jesus was not but a servant upon whom we bestowed favor, and we made him an example for the children of israel”.( az zukhurf :59).

here it means (ma) of negation in the text restricted using exception and negation.   

-and it also comes by the meaning of (yes),

like the previously mentioned ayah of surat taha :63  

" qaloo in  hathani lasahiraniy ureedani an yukhrijakum min ardikum bisihrihima wa yathhaba bitareeqatikumu almuthla''

“they said, "decidedly these two (men) are indeed (both) sorcerers; they would (like) to drive you out of your land by their sorcery, and go away with your exemplary mode (of life)”

and the story of the bedouin who came to the son of abullah ibn al zobair may allah be pleased with both of them asking him for money but he noticed that he had no right to take money so he didn't give him any. but he insists on asking him for money and ibn al zobair refused to give him. so the bedouin said:''may allah curse the camel led me to you''. he answered him: ''in wa rakabaha(yes and its rider)

these are ten lies,,,and unless the occasion had been an article, i would have exceeded passing the forty hundred but this is enough to judge butrus as a liar.

Refuting the Suspicion that says: Cutting the Thief's Hand is a Proof of Violence in Islam

they said: cutting the thief's hand in the islamic legislations is a very severe punishment not stipulated or enacted in any other religion; therefore, this will cause additional psychological pain to the thief, even after repenting, because the people will continue reproaching him.

refuting this suspicion

before thinking in this discredit, you should know the essential facts of the matter and put in your mind that those people are accustomed to lying & falsifying to the same degree the human beings are accustomed to drinking and eating; therefore, don't feel surprise while reading this discredit.

cutting the hand is a punishment known in all religions

the punishment of cutting the hand is not an islamic legislation only, but it was prevailing in the other religions alike, and here are the proofs:

first: the old testament

1- the lord told moses:

anyone who kidnaps another and either sells him or still has him when he is caught must be put to death [1]

2- the lord said:

(you must observe my sabbaths. this will be a sign between me and you for the generations to come, so you may know that i am the lord, who makes you holy)

(observethesabbath, becauseitisholytoyou. anyonewhodesecratesitmustbeputtodeath)[2]

(iftwomenarefightingandthewifeofoneofthemcomestorescueherhusbandfromhisassailant, andshereachesoutandseizeshimbyhisprivateparts, youshallcutoffherhand. showhernopity)

second: in the new testament

the gospel of mathew stated:

(18:8) (if your hand or your foot causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. it is better for you to enter life maimed or crippled than to have two hands or two feet and be thrown into eternal fire. and if your eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. it is better for you to enter life with one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into the fire of hell)

the statements of the priests and ministers proved that they have encouraged their followers to cut their limbs in order to please jesus (as they claim).

the gospel of mathew stated also:

(19:12) (forsomeareeunuchsbecausetheywerebornthatway; othersweremadethatwaybymen; andothershaverenouncedmarriagebecauseofthekingdomofheaven. theonewhocanacceptthisshouldacceptit)

the gospel of mathew stated also:

(butifanyonecausesoneoftheselittleoneswhobelieveinmetosin, itwouldbebetterforhimtohavealargemillstonehungaroundhisneckandtobedrownedinthedepthsofthesea).

we can notice from the above mentioned texts the following:

the punishment of cutting was an applicable legislation before islam.

the punishment of cutting was not restricted to the hand, but it was including other parts, such as the one who wishes to make sexual intercourse with a woman or commit a sin his punishment will be to cut the member or organ of his body by which he has committed the sin.

one of the ways which were followed to get the pleasure of god is to castrate oneself.

committing suicide was permissible.

accordingly…

the above mentioned texts prove that islam did not create the cutting punishment as alleged by them; contrary, such punishment was prevailing in the divine religions before islam. in fact, islam has regulated and restricted the punishment of cutting into few cases only.

applying cutting after the collapse of the self deterrence

we should know that punishments in islam came as a second stage after the collapse of the religious self deterrence. principally, man should worship allah, follow the orders of the holy quran and the orders of the prophet mohammad -peace be upon him- but in certain cases, some people go beyond the borders of the islamic teachings. in such case, there should be a deterrent punishment for any person thinking in violating the islamic teachings; accordingly, the punishment of cutting the thief's hand was legislated to any person who dares to breach the orders of allah the almighty.

the punishment of cutting before & after islam

as mentioned before, we noticed that the punishment of cutting was not limited to stealing before islam. it was applicable on several cases, but in islam, this punishment was restricted into two cases only:

first: cutting the thief's hand

second: highwaymen punishment.

both are considered of the crimes which inflict serious damages on society; accordingly, there should be conformity between the crime and the punishment in order to deter the criminals and put an end to such phenomenon.

restricting the punishment of cutting

the punishment of cutting the thief's hand is not applicable on all cases. the stolen things should reach certain limit in order to apply this punishment. for example, the one who steals some insignificant things will not be subject to the cutting punishment; he will be censured only [3].

prohibiting stealing

islam always provides the radical treatment to the problems before it happens. islam has prohibited stealing and warned from stealing in order to enhance the religious self-deterrence attitudes of people in a way to make them fear allah the almighty and avoid involvement in such crimes. ali -may allah be pleased with him -was asked: does the prophet -peace be upon him -conferred you any special things? ali replied: no, the prophet -peace be upon him -did not confer us anything not conferred to the public at all except something in the sheath of my sword. he then took a sheet stating: allah the almighty has cursed these kinds of people: the one who offers sacrifices for other than allah, the one who steals the lands of others, the one who curse his parents, and the one who accommodates a person inventing new religious matters not stipulated by the prophet -peace be upon him -or his companions. [4]

the prophet -peace be upon him -demonstrated the prohibition of stealing because it entails the curse from allah the almighty. the curse means depriving him from the mercy of allah the almighty; accordingly, if the man understood the meaning of curse and insisted on stealing, he will be subject to a deterrent punishment.

stealing prevention in islam

islam has taught muslims to refrain from begging people in order to maintain their dignity and keep them away from the insignificant things. the prophet -peace be upon him -has stipulated these principles in the pledge of allegiance. abu muslim al-khawlani narrated that awf bin malek said: "we -seven, eight or nine persons -were once with the prophet -peace be upon him. he said: will you pledge allegiance to the prophet? -peace be upon him -we were then new muslims. we replied: yes, we pledge our allegiance to you. the prophet repeated the sentence three times and we replied in the same manner. then, a man said: o prophet of allah, we have pledged allegiance to you, but for what? the prophet -peace be upon him -said: "pledge that you will worship allah alone without setting other gods beside him, pray the five prayers every day and obey me. then he said in low voice: "don't beg people anything". hearing that, we complied to the degree that someone's whip may fall down and he does not ask us to give it to him". [5]

the author or "al tarhib & al targhib" book said:

those good companions have implemented the essence of the pledge exactly. allah the almighty was pleased with them. the companions have achieved victory against themselves before achieving the victory on people. they have adhered to the right way of islam.

thoban narrated that the prophet -peace be upon him -said: if any of you promises that he will not beg people anything i promise him paradise. thoban said: i will do. saying that, thoban did not beg people anything at all. [6]

the prophet -peace be upon him -has demonstrated to them that the taking-hand is the "lower hand" and the giving-hand is the "higher hand" and taught them to be virtuous and satisfied so that allah will bless them with virtues and satisfaction always.

abi saeed al-khudri -may allah be pleased with him -narrated that some of al-ansar (locals of medina) asked the prophet -peace be upon him -to give them alms. the prophet -peace be upon him -gave them what they wanted. then they asked him again for more until they took everything. the prophet -peace be upon him -said then: (if i have anything for charity i will give you but the one who seeks to be virtuous allah will bless him with virtues, the one who seeks satisfaction allah will make him satisfied and the one who seeks tolerance allah will make him tolerant; there is nothing better than having patience and tolerance) [7]

work is the solution

the prophet -peace be upon him -has taught the companions two major islamic principles:

the first principle:

work is the pillar for earning living. the muslim should seek work and ask allah to provide him with means of subsistence, because work is better than begging people and face-losing.

al-zubair bin al-awwam -may allah be pleased with him -has narrated that the prophet -peace be upon him -said: [it is better to take a rope, gather firewood, carry it on your back and sell it seeking the satisfaction from allah than begging people who may give or decline] [8].

the second principle:

it is prohibited to beg people and ask them for alms because this will expose the person to face-losing, humiliation and disgrace. the muslim should not beg others for alms except for a force of majeure. however, if he asked people while having something satisfying his needs, his begging will turn into a scratch in his face on the day of judgment.

there are several prophetic traditions containing fearful threats from begging. hamza bin abdullah bin abih narrated that the prophet -peace be upon him -said: [if a person insisted on begging people again and again, he will lose the flesh of his face when he meets allah the almighty at the day of judgment] [9]

ashab as-sunan narrated: [if a man begged people for alms while having something satisfying his needs he will come at the day of judgment with scratches on his face]. the companions asked the prophet -peace be upon him -what is the limit of satisfying the needs? he replied: fifty dirham or its equivalent of gold]. narrated by the four narrators. therefore, begging people for alms will prejudice the most important mark for dignity and humanity i.e. his face.

another tradition stated: [the person who has an ounce and beg people for alms is considered importunate] narrated by abu dawood and an-nasai. the ounce is equal to forty dirham.

another tradition stated: [the person who begs others for alms while having something satisfying his needs is just demanding much of fire -or firebrands of hell -as much as he is begging people for more]. the companions asked? what is the limit which satisfies his needs? he replied: [something enough for his lunch and dinner]. narrated by abu dawood. is the meaning here to have the actual food for lunch and dinner only? or does he earn his living day by day permanently? the latter option is the most appropriate, because the one who earns his living day by day, on continuous basis, is the one who has something satisfying his needs.

treatment

the practical treatment for this phenomenon has two aspects:

firstly:

to provide a suitable job for each un-employed person because this is the duty of the islamic country toward its citizens. the in-charge officers should not remain like a bystander doing nothing for the un-employed persons. similarly, they should not just provide subsidies to them from the money of zaka (alms giving).

secondly:

the prophet -peace be upon him -said: (almsgiving should not be given to a rich or healthy strong man) because any subsidies given to a healthy strong man will encourage him to remain un-employed and will make him compete with the weak and helpless people for their rights.

the right thing to do here is exactly what the prophet -peace be upon him -did when one of the beggars came to him. anas bin malekh narrated that one of al-ansar (the locals of medina) came to the prophet -peace be upon him -begging him. the prophet said: don't you have anything in your house? the man said: yes, i have a saddlecloth (piece of cloth put on the back of the camel or stretched in the ground under other clothes), we wear part and stretch part thereof and we have a pot to drink water from. the prophet told him: bring them here. the man brought them to the prophet. the prophet -peace be upon him -took them and said: who wish to buy these items? a man replied: i buy them against one dirham. the prophet said: who pay more? (he repeated the sentence two or three times), than another man said: i buy them against two dirham. the prophet gave the items to the man and took the two dirham and then told the begging man: take one dirham and buy food for your family and buy with the other an ax and then come to me. the man done the same and returned back to the prophet -peace be upon him-. the prophet pulled a stick with his hand and said: [go and collect firewood and sell it. don't come here except after fifteen days]. the man started collecting and selling firewood and earned ten dirham. he bought some clothes and food. the prophet -peace be upon him -told him: [this is far better to you than coming at the day of judgment with spots on your face. begging for alms is not allowed except for three kinds of people: a man suffering abject poverty -i.e. extreme poverty -a man under heavy burden of debts or losses, and a man bound with a blood money".

islam is the pioneer always

in this great prophetic tradition we noticed that the prophet -peace be upon him -did not wish to give the begging man from the almsgiving money because he was strong and healthy and should not have approach people except after finding no way out. the in-charge of authority should help such man by providing job opportunities enabling them from earning their living.

this prophetic tradition set up the pioneer methods in treating this problem. the prophet -peace be upon him -did not give the man temporary subsidies or preached him only -as done by many people. he has helped the man to find the solution for his problem by himself successfully.

the prophet -peace be upon him -has taught the man that everything helping you to legally earn your living is considered a noble work, even if you just collect firewood and sell it. by this way, he can maintain his dignity and save his face. moreover, the prophet -peace be upon him -has chosen the suitable job for his abilities, circumstances and environment then prepared the tool of work for him in order to guide him to the right way and save him from confusion. not only this, the prophet -peace be upon him -has given the man a respite of fifteen days in order to evaluate the fitness of such work to such man in order to either approve the job or guide him to another work.

the prophet -peace be upon him -has taught that person practical and theoretical lesson in order to find a solution for his problem. accordingly, we should all follow this great prophetic method in preventing begging. we should first solve the problems then provide the suitable work for each un-employed person.

the role of zaka (almsgiving)

zaka has a great role in solving an essential part of the problem. a certain part of zaka returns can be allocated to help the healthy un-employed people finding the right job. they can be trained to work in certain profession helping them to earn living, not only this, the returns of zaka can be used to establish joint projects -such as factories, shops, farms, etc -to employ the un-employed persons and give them the full or part of the title thereof.

the second aspect in treating the problem of begging, in the perspective of islam, is to ensure a good living level for anyone unable to earn his living either

first: because of a physical weakness preventing the person from earning his living such as the children and orphans or for suffering from any disability in senses or members of the body or severe sickness, etc. such physical reasons which prevent the person from overcoming them are considered a ground to take a share from the returns of zaka in order to provide them with their living and help their weakness. however, in our modern life, society has provided some job opportunities for the handicapped by helping them in learning and training them on certain professions and jobs in a way to fit their disabilities and enable them from earning their living. it is allowed to take from the money of zaka in order to teach and train them.

second: or because of not finding the canals of the permissible jobs by the un-employed persons in spite of their sincere search and attempts, and in spite of the efforts excreted by the in-charge authority to provide them with jobs. in such case, those persons will be considered in the same category of the disabled even if they are healthy and strong, because strength and health alone are not enough without a source of earning living.

imam ahmad and others narrated the story of the two men who came begging the prophet -peace be upon him -to give them from the almsgiving money. the prophet looked at them and noticed that they are strong enough to earn their living by themselves, then said: "if you want, i will give you, but you should know that almsgiving is not for the rich or the strong person who can earn his living".

accordingly, we can notice that many people have mistaken when they thought that alms can be given to any one begging for money. not only this, some people thought that zaka is increasing the number of beggars! but actually, if we understood the real meaning of zaka as legislated by islam, if we collected zaka as ordered by islam, and if we distributed zaka as instructed by islam, we will surly put an end to beggary.

the prohibition of inflicting damages on oneself

islam has prohibited all kinds of harming the self; therefore, islam did not legislate offering sacrifices by cutting a member from the body, such as castration, and did not legislate to tear out the eye if it looked for something prohibited; contrary, islam has provided a radical solution by prohibiting any action which may cause damages or harm on the self, money or third parties.

suicide is prohibited in islam

before islam, killing the self was one of the worships to god, but in islam, it is prohibited to do the same and it is considered a great sin. allah the almighty said: [and do not kill yourselves (nor kill one another). surely, allah is most merciful to you * and whoever commits that through aggression and injustice, we shall cast him into the fire, and that is easy for allah * if you avoid the great sins which you are forbidden to do, we shall remit from you your (small) sins, and admit you to a noble entrance (i.e. paradise).] (10).

allah the almighty has prohibited us from killing ourselves or killing others, and leveled a serious warning and severe punishment to anyone killing himself, then demonstrated that obeying the orders of allah and avoiding the matters prohibited by allah are the right way to reach happiness in the life and hereafter.

accordingly, we should acknowledge that islam has treated the problem before taking place by setting up the rules and principles which should be strictly followed in order to protect people from committing such big sins; therefore, anyone that knows that well and insists on committing such prohibited actions, this means that there is some imperfection in his belief and he deserves to be punished in a way conforms to his crime, because stealing in such cases is considered illegal & satanic desires.

as for torture in applying the cutting punishment, we should not leave our emotions and feelings prevail on our thinking, because the thief himself did not have mercy on himself, how can we give him mercy. moreover, if the thief thinks about the punishment, he will refrain from doing the crime because of his previous knowledge of the punishment; furthermore, he will be an example to the others who see him, because islam in this regard cares for the common welfare not the individual interests.