تناقضات عن الصلب 


contradictions about crucification

WHO DIES FOR WHOM? 

Jesus Died For Our sins? 


Romans 4:25


1 Peter 3:18


1 Corinthians 15:3 


1 John 2:2

No Man Can Die For The Sins Of Another


Ezekiel 18:1-30


Deuteronomy 24:16 


Psalms 49:7


Jeremiah 31:30


1 Corinthians 3:8

We didn't inherit ANY sins from Adam because in Quran 7:23 and Quran 2:37 below, he sought God's forgiveness and God forgave him."

Jesus is not the son of God

First we ask , why do u call Jesus the son of God ?


Is he the only one mentioned in the bible as the son of God ?!!

There are more than 18 biblical verses stating that there are sons of God beside Jesus

These are few examples

👉 Exodus 4:22 Then say to Pharaoh, ‘This is what the LORD says: 


Israel is my firstborn son.

👉Psalms 89:26-27 

 “I have chosen David as my first-born son, and he will be the ruler of all kings on earth.

👉Deuteronomy 32:19


 The LORD saw this and rejected them because he was angered by his sons and daughters.

👉 2 Samuel 7:14 


I will be his Father, and he shall be My son.If he commits iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men and with the blows of the sons of men.

👉 Isaiah 43:6


 I will say to the north, ‘Give them up!’ and to the south, ‘Do not hold themback.Bring my sons from afar and my daughters from the ends of the earth.

Ephraim is my firstborn son.

👉Jeremiah 31:9 They will come with weeping;they will pray as I bring them back.I will lead them beside streams of water on a level path where they will not stumble, because I am Israel’s father, and Ephraim is my firstborn son.

*What does the term “son of God” really mean*? 


 


We find the term “son of God” is symbolically used in the earliest biblical languages for a “righteous person” for many people – not exclusively for Jesus. God is far removed from having a physical and literal son.

عيسى يدعوا للوحدانية


Jesus Calls for the Oneness of Allah

"For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me." John 6: 38

Jesus  says:


"Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent."


 John 17: 3

🔹Worshiping One God Was The Core Message Of Jesus

And the first commandment of Jesus .

Jesus said :

“If you love me, keep my commandments." John 14: 15

So, what are these commandments?


Jesus replied, 


"The most important one is this: 'Listen, O Israel! The LORD our God is the one and only LORD." Mark 12: 29

 "and you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.’"Mar 12:30


........

"Right, Teacher, the scribe replied.“You have stated correctly that God is One and there is no other but Him" 


Mark 12: 32.

👇👇


This is the speech of Jesus  himself.


Jesus called for absolute Oneness

"The LORD our God is the one and only LORD." (Mark 12: 29)

عيسى و التغيير في المسيحية 


WHERE IS THE “CHRIST”


 IN “CHRISTIANITY?”*

By Laurence B. Brown, MD

Religious scholars have long attributed the tenets of Christian faith more to Paul’s teachings than to those of Jesus.  But as much as I would like to jump into that subject, I think it best to back up and take a quick, speculative look at the Old Testament.

The Old Testament teaches that Jacob wrestled with God.  In fact, the Old Testament records that Jacob not only wrestled with God, but that Jacob prevailed (Genesis 32:24-30).  Now, bear in mind, we’re talking about a tiny blob of protoplasm wrestling the Creator of a universe 240,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 miles in diameter, containing over a billion galaxies of which ours—the Milky Way Galaxy—is just one (and a small one, at that), and prevailing?  I’m sorry, but someone was a couple pages short of a codex when they scribed that passage.  The point is, however, that this passage leaves us in a quandary.  We either have to question the Jewish concept of God or accept their explanation that “God” does not mean “God” in the above verses, but rather it means either an angel or a man (which, in essence, means the Old Testament is not to be trusted).  In fact, this textual difficulty has become so problematic that more recent Bibles have tried to cover it up by changing the translation from “God” to “man.”  What they cannot change, however, is the foundational scripture from which the Jewish Bible is translated, and this continues to read “God.”

Unreliability is a recurring problem in the Old Testament, the most prominent example being the confusion between God and Satan!  II Samuel 24:1 reads:

“Again the anger of the LORD was aroused against Israel, and He moved David against them to say, ‘Go, number Israel and Judah.’”

However, I Chronicles 21:1 states: “Now Satan stood up against Israel, and moved David to number Israel.”

Uhhh, which was it?  The Lord, or Satan?  Both verses describe the same event in history, but one speaks of God and the other of Satan.  There is a slight (like, total) difference.

Christians would like to believe that the New Testament is free of such difficulties, but they are sadly deceived.  In fact, there are so many contradictions that authors have devoted books to this subject.  For example, Matthew 2:14 and Luke 2:39 differ over whether Jesus’ family fled to Egypt or Nazareth.  Matthew 6:9-13 and Luke 11:2-4 differ over the wording of the “Lord’s Prayer.”  Matthew 11:13-14, 17:11-13 and John 1:21 disagree over whether or not John the Baptist was Elijah.

Things get worse when we enter the arena of the alleged crucifixion: Who carried the cross—Simon (Luke 23:26, Matthew 27:32, Mark 15:21) or Jesus (John 19:17)?  Was Jesus dressed in a scarlet robe (Matthew 27:28) or a purple robe (John 19:2)?  Did the Roman soldiers put gall (Matthew 27:34) or myrrh (Mark 15:23) in his wine?  Was Jesus crucified before the third hour (Mark 15:25) or after the sixth hour (John 19:14-15)?  Did Jesus ascend the first day (Luke 23:43) or not (John 20:17)?  Were Jesus’ last words, “Father, ‘into Your hands I commit my spirit’” (Luke 23:46), or were they “It is finished” (John 19:30)?

These are only a few of a long list of scriptural inconsistencies, and they underscore the difficulty in trusting the New Testament as scripture.  Nonetheless, there are those who do trust their salvation to the New Testament, and it is these Christians who need to answer the question, “Where is the ‘Christ’ in ‘Christianity?’  “This, in fact, is a supremely fair question.  On one hand we have a religion named after Jesus Christ, but on the other hand the tenets of orthodox Christianity, which is to say Trinitarian Christianity, contradict virtually everything he taught.

I know, I know—those of you who aren’t screaming “Heretic!”  are gathering firewood and planting a stake.  But wait.  Put down the high-powered rifle and listen.  Trinitarian Christianity claims to base its doctrines on a combination of Jesus’ and Paul’s teachings.

The problem is, these teachings are anything but complementary.  In fact, they contradict one another.

Take some examples: Jesus taught Old Testament Law; Paul negated it.  Jesus preached orthodox Jewish creed; Paul preached mysteries of faith.  Jesus spoke of accountability; Paul proposed justification by faith.  Jesus described himself as an ethnic prophet; Paul defined him as a universal prophet.[1]  Jesus taught prayer to God, Paul set Jesus up as intercessor.  Jesus taught divine unity, Pauline theologians constructed the Trinity.

For these reasons, many scholars consider Paul the main corrupter of Apostolic Christianity and Jesus’ teachings.  Many early Christian sects held this view as well, including the second-century Christian sects known as “adoptionists”– “In particular, they considered Paul, one of the most prominent authors of our New Testament, to be an arch-heretic rather than an apostle.”[2]

Lehmann contributes:

“What Paul proclaimed as ‘Christianity’ was sheer heresy which could not be based on the Jewish or Essene faith, or on the teaching of Rabbi Jesus.  But, as Schonfield says, ‘The Pauline heresy became the foundation of Christian orthodoxy and the legitimate church was disowned as heretical.’ … Paul did something that Rabbi Jesus never did and refused to do.  He extended God’s promise of salvation to the Gentiles; he abolished the law of Moses, and he prevented direct access to God by introducing an intermediary.”[3]

Bart D. Ehrman, perhaps the most authoritative living scholar of textual criticism, comments:

“Paul’s view was not universally accepted or, one might argue, even widely accepted …. Even more striking, Paul’s own letters indicate that there were outspoken, sincere, and active Christian leaders who vehemently disagreed with him on this score and considered Paul’s views to be a corruption of the true message of Christ ….  One should always bear in mind that in this very letter of Galatians Paul indicates that he confronted Peter over just such issues (Gal. 2:11-14).  He disagreed, that is, even with Jesus’ closest disciple on the matter.”[4]

Commenting on the views of some early Christians in the Pseudo-Clementine literature, Ehrman wrote:

“Paul has corrupted the true faith based on a brief vision, which he has doubtless misconstrued.  Paul is thus the enemy of the apostles, not the chief of them.  He is outside the true faith, a heretic to be banned, not an apostle to be followed.”[5]

Others elevate Paul to sainthood.  Joel Carmichael very clearly is not one of them:

“We are a universe away from Jesus.  If Jesus came “only to fulfill” the Law and the Prophets; If he thought that “not an iota, not a dot” would “pass from the Law,” that the cardinal commandment was “Hear, O Israel, the Lord Our God, the Lord is one,” and that “no one was good but God”….What would he have thought of Paul’s handiwork! Paul’s triumph meant the final obliteration of the historic Jesus; he comes to us embalmed in Christianity like a fly in amber.”[6]

Dr. Johannes Weiss contributes:

“Hence the faith in Christ as held by the primitive churches and by Paul was something new in comparison with the preaching of Jesus; it was a new type of religion.”[7]

A new type of religion, indeed.  And hence the question, “Where is the ‘Christ’ in ‘Christianity?’  “If Christianity is the religion of Jesus Christ, where are the Old Testament laws and strict monotheism of the Rabbi Jesus’ Orthodox Judaism?  Why does Christianity teach that Jesus is the son of God when Jesus called himself the “son of Man” eighty-eight times, and not once the “son of God?”  Why does Christianity endorse confession to priests and prayers to saints, Mary and Jesus when Jesus taught his followers:

“In this manner, therefore, pray: ‘Our Father …’” (Matthew 6:9)?

And who appointed a pope?  Certainly not Jesus.  True, he may have called Peter the rock upon which he would build his church (Matthew 16:18-19).  However, a scant five verses later, he called Peter “Satan” and “an offense.”  And let us not forget that this “rock” thrice denied Jesus after Jesus’ arrest—poor testimony of Peter’s commitment to the new church.

Is it possible that Christians have been denying Jesus ever since?  Transforming Jesus’ strict monotheism to the Pauline theologians’ Trinity, replacing Rabbi Jesus’ Old Testament law with Paul’s “justification by faith,” substituting the concept of Jesus having atoned for the sins of mankind for the direct accountability Jesus taught, discarding Jesus’ claim to humanity for Paul’s concept of Jesus having been divine, we have to question in exactly what manner Christianity respects the teachings of its prophet.

A parallel issue is to define which religion does respect Jesus’ teachings.  So let’s see: Which religion honors Jesus Christ as a prophet but a man?  Which religion adheres to strict monotheism, God’s laws, and the concept of direct accountability to God?  Which religion denies intermediaries between man and God?

If you answered, “Islam,” you would be right.  And in this manner, we find the teachings of Jesus Christ better exemplified in the religion of Islam than in Christianity.  This suggestion, however, is not meant to be a conclusion, but rather an introduction.  Those who find their interest peaked by the above discussion need to take the issue seriously, open their minds and then … read on!

 

Copyright © 2007 Laurence B. Brown.

FOOTNOTES:


[1]


Jesus Christ was one more prophet in the long line of prophets sent to the astray Israelites. As he so clearly affirmed, “I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” (Matthew 15:24) When Jesus sent the disciples out in the path of God, he instructed them, “Do not go into the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter a city of the Samaritans. But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” (Matthew 10:5-6) Throughout his ministry, Jesus was never recorded as having converted a Gentile, and in fact is recorded as having initially rebuked a Gentile for seeking his favors, likening her to a dog (Matthew 15:22-28 and Mark 7:25-30). Jesus was himself a Jew, his disciples were Jews, and both he and they directed their ministries to the Jews. One wonders what this means to us now, for most of those who have taken Jesus as their ‘personal savior’ are Gentiles, and not of the “lost sheep of the house of Israel” to whom he was sent.


[2]


Ehrman, Bart D.


The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings


. 2004. Oxford University Press. P. 3.


[3]


Lehmann, Johannes. 1972.


The Jesus Report


. Translated by Michael Heron. London: Souvenir Press. pp. 128, 134.


[4]


Ehrman, Bart D. 2003.


Lost Christianities


. Oxford University Press. Pp. 97-98.


[5]


Ehrman, Bart D. 2003.


Lost Christianities


. Oxford University Press. P. 184.


[6]


Carmichael, Joel, M.A. 1962.


The Death of Jesus


. New York: The Macmillan Company. p. 270.


[7]


Weiss, Johannes. 1909.


Paul and Jesus


. (Translated by Rev. H. J. Chaytor). London and New York: Harper and Brothers. p. 130..

كذبة التثليث


Trinity an invented lie 


1 (same) X 1 (same) X 1 (same) = 1 (same) "True language of mathematics" 

1(same)*1(same)*1(same)=1: it is possible

Now lets see above true mathematics in term of christanity 

but bible and Christianity says: 

1 (Santa Claus-Different person-Father ) + 1 (Young Boy-Different person-Jesus) + (Holy Ghost-Spirit without flesh) # 1 they are not one so it is not possible in mathematically + biblically 

So 

1 (different person:old man like santa clause+1 (different person:young man:jesus)+1(different person:Holy Ghost-dove)#1 so Trinity which is theoretically possible but logically, scientifically and in reality: impossible: 3 different persons can never equal to 1. it will be three, not 1, 

reality

It will be 1 (God-a Guider who guides through sent messenger-God of jesus and all: (Eli or Elohim or Allah: example:


Bible says 'Your God, my God, Your Father, My Father' John 20:17)

 + 

1(jesus pbuh: prophet: a man approved of God: bible Act2:22-God did miracles by him) 

+ 

1(holy spirit-a creation of God : bible: word: pneuma: compare word in Mathew 1:18 & Luke 1:26) 

=


three & this proves to a logical person that 3# 1. 

That is why trinity has been removed by 32 Christian scholars from bible in RSV version. Why removed??? 

The closest verse that you can find in the Bible, which can be taken for ‘trinity’ is the first Epistle of John, Chapter, No. 5, Verse No. 7 which says…‘For there are three which bears record in heaven – the father, the word, and the holy Ghost – and these three are one’. This verse of the Bible, 1st Epistle of John, Chapter 5, Verse No. 7, is the closest resemblance to ‘trinity’ in the full Bible. But if you read the ‘Revised Standard Version’, which has been revised by 32 scholars of the highest eminence, backed by 50 different Christian co-operating denominations – they have removed this verse from the Bible as an interpolation, as a concoction, as a fabrication. It was not removed by Muslims or non-Christian scholars – but it was removed by 32  Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by 50 different co-operative denominations as an interpolation, as a concoction, as a fabrication, because it was not there in the original manuscript. We Muslims  – we should thank the galaxies of DDs, ‘the doctors of Divinity’, for getting the Bible one step closer to the Qu’ran – Closer to Islam. As the Qu’ran says…(Arabic)…‘Don’t say trinity’. In fact if you analyze, as I said in my talk, Jesus Christ, (peace be upon him), never spoke about ‘trinity’- that father, son and Holy Ghost – they were one. In fact he said in the Gospel of John, Chapter 14, Verse No. 28, ‘My father is greater than I’, Gospel of John, Chapter No. 10, Verse No. 29, ‘My father is greater than I’, Gospel of Mathew, Chapter No. 12, Verse No. 28, ‘I cast out devils with the spirit of God’. Gospel of Luke, Chapter No. 11, Verse No. 20 ‘With the finger of God, I cast out devil’, Gospel of John Chapter No. 5, Verse No. 30, ‘I can of my own self do nothing – As I hear I judge and my judgement is just – Because I seek not my will but the will of the Father who has sent me’- He never spoke about ‘trinity’. In fact when he was asked that, ‘which is the first of the commandments’ – he said – its mentioned in the Gospel of Mark, Chapter No. 12, Verse. No. 29…(Hebrew)… Which means, ‘Hear O Israel, the Lord our God is one Lord

Christian Church – in the Catechism, they tell you that the Father is a person, the Son is a person, and the Holy Ghost is a person – but they aren’t three persons, – they are one person’. Person, person, person, but not three persons – one person – What language is this? 1+1+1 is equal to 3, Its not equal to 1. 1 into 3 is 3…Not 1.  So when we ask them that suppose, there are three triplets, identical triplets – If one of them commits murder, can you hang the other – they say… ‘No’. Then you ask them why? – Because each one has a different personality – If one of the triplets commit murder you cannot hang the other, because each one has a different personality.

# 2

And when the Christian, when they think of the Father in heaven, they think like an old man like ‘Santa Clause’, sitting in the Heaven on one of the Planet with the earth as His foot stool. When they think about the son, that Jesus Christ, (peace be upon him), they think if a tall man who is fair, who has got blonde eyes like Jeffrey Hunter. You see in the movie ‘King of Kings’. He did the acting of Jesus Christ (peace be upon him) – Jeffery Hunter – they have a certain mental picture. When they talk about Holy Ghost, they think of a ‘dove’ as the Bible says… ‘which came upon Jesus Christ, peace be upon him when he was baptized’ – Or they think it like a ‘spirit’ that came at the feast of Pentecost which is mentioned in the Bible. But when you ask the Christian that when you speak about trinity, how many pictures do you have in your mind – the Christian will tell you… ‘One’. Believe me he is lying to you, because 1+1+1 is three, it is not one.

3 is not 1: if God, jesus and holy ghost 3=1 so they all 3 should know each and every thing and should have knowledge equally as they one: but bible says: when you read in the Bible, in the  Gospel of  Mark, Ch. No. 13,  Verse No. 32, it says ‘Of that day, of that hour, knoweth no man, – no, not even the angels in the heaven, nor the son of man, but the father’. ‘The knowledge of the hour of  that day – no one knows. Jesus Christ (peace be upon him) said ‘Except the Father’ – not even the angels, not even himself. If Father -, the God Almighty, and Jesus Christ (peace be upon him), were one and the same – then if knowledge of hour is known to God Almighty, even Jesus should know about it (peace be upon him). So this proves that they were not one. Further… further, if the brother dies, even the man and the businessman will die… If the brother dies, even man and businessman will die. So when Jesus Christ (peace be upon him), according to the Bible… according to the Christians, he died on the Cross – do you mean to say even God Almighty and the Holy ghost died?

3 is not 1: father, son, that is Jesus Christ (peace be upon him) and holy ghost, the same? We know very well that human beings have got flesh and bones – A spirit and God Almighty have got no flesh and bones. Human beings require to eat -God Almighty does not require to eat. And the same message Jesus Christ (peace be upon him) gave – Its mentioned in the Gospel of Luke Ch. No.24, V.No.39 to 43. That, ‘Behold my hands and feet – Its I myself. Handle me and see – that a spirit has got  no flesh and bones as you see me have. And he gave his hands and feet – And they were overjoyed. To prove what? that he was not a spirit – he was not God Almighty. And the verse continues ‘Do you have meat to eat’ and the next verse says that he ate broiled fish and honey comb.  To prove what? – that he was God? To prove that he was not God! Jesus Christ (peace be upon him) said, ‘A spirit has no flesh and bones, as you see me have: I have proving that he was not a spirit – he was not Almighty God.

 

*Who is Allah?*

*Some of The biggest misconceptions that many non-Muslims have about Islam have to do with the word "ALLAH".*

For various reasons, many people have come to believe that Muslims worship a different God than Christians and Jews. This is totally false, since *"ALLAH"* is simply that Arabic word for


"God"


- and there is only One God. Muslims worship the God of Noah, Abraham, Moses, David and Jesus - peace be upon them all. However, it is certainly true that Jews, Christians and Muslims all have different concepts of Almighty God.

For example, Muslims - like Jews - reject the Christians beliefs of the Trinity and the Divine Incarnation.

First of all, it is important to note that *"ALLAH"* is the same word that Arabic-speaking Christians and Jews use for God. If you pick up an Arabic Bible, you will see the word "ALLAH" being used where "God" is used in English. This is because *"ALLAH"* is the only word in the Arabic language equivalent to the English word "God".

Additionally, the word *"ALLAH" CANNOT* be made plural or given a gender, which goes hand in hand with the Islamic concept of God. If we were to use the name God, it can be made into plurals and given gender, i.e. god's, goddess, etc.

The Aramaic word *"El",* which is the word for God in the Language that Jesus (pbuh) used and spoke, is certainly more similar in sound to the word *"ALLAH"* than the English word *"God".* This also holds true for the various Hebrew words for God, which are *"El"* and "Elah", and the plural form *"Elohim".* The reason for these similarities is that Aramaic, Hebrew and Arabic are all Semitic languages (Sister Languages), with common origins.

Translating the Bible into English, the Hebrew word "El" is translated variously as *"God",* "god" and "angel"! This imprecise language allows different translators, based on their preconceived notions, to translate the word to fit their own views. The Arabic Word *"ALLAH"* on the other hand presents no such difficulty, since it is only used for The Almighty God alone.

The Arabic word


"ALLAH"


also contains a deep religious message due to its root meaning and origin. This is because it stems from the Arabic verb ta'allaha (or alaha), which means "to be worshipped". Thus in Arabic, the word *"ALLAH"* means *"The One who deserves all worship".* This, in a nutshell, is the Pure Monotheistic (one) message of Islam.